You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consensus recommendations on the classification, definition and diagnostic criteria of hip-related pain in young and middle-aged active adults from the International Hip-related Pain Research Network, Zurich 2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Sports Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101453 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael P Reiman, Rintje Agricola, Joanne L Kemp, Joshua J Heerey, Adam Weir, Pim van Klij, Ara Kassarjian, Andrea Britt Mosler, Eva Ageberg, Per Hölmich, Kristian Marstrand Warholm, Damian Griffin, Sue Mayes, Karim M Khan, Kay M Crossley, Mario Bizzini, Nancy Bloom, Nicola C Casartelli, Laura E Diamond, Stephanie Di Stasi, Michael Drew, Daniel J Friedman, Matthew Freke, Boris Gojanovic, Sion Glyn-Jones, Marcie Harris-Hayes, Michael A Hunt, Franco M Impellizzeri, Lasse Ishøi, Denise M Jones, Matthew G King, Peter R Lawrenson, Michael Leunig, Cara L Lewis, Nicolas Mathieu, Håvard Moksnes, May-Arna Risberg, Mark James Scholes, Adam I Semciw, Andreas Serner, Kristian Thorborg, Tobias Wörner, Hendrik Paulus Dijkstra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 210 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 24 | 11% |
| United States | 23 | 11% |
| Australia | 19 | 9% |
| Spain | 14 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 75 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 146 | 70% |
| Scientists | 39 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 317 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 11% |
| Other | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Researcher | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 126 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 67 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 28 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 130 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#321,712
of 25,195,876 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#702
of 6,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,925
of 470,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#15
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,195,876 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.