↓ Skip to main content

Auditing GPs’ prescribing habits: cardiovascular prescribing frequently continues medication initiated by specialists

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, July 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Auditing GPs’ prescribing habits: cardiovascular prescribing frequently continues medication initiated by specialists
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, July 1996
DOI 10.1007/s002280050121
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. S. de Vries, N. M. van Diepen, T. F. J. Tromp, L. T. W. Jong-van den Berg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 27%
Other 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,481,383
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#830
of 2,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,261
of 29,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.