↓ Skip to main content

Cancer Risks for Relatives of Patients With Serrated Polyposis

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Gastroenterology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cancer Risks for Relatives of Patients With Serrated Polyposis
Published in
American Journal of Gastroenterology, April 2012
DOI 10.1038/ajg.2012.52
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aung Ko Win, Rhiannon J Walters, Daniel D Buchanan, Mark A Jenkins, Kevin Sweet, Wendy L Frankel, Albert de la Chapelle, Diane M McKeone, Michael D Walsh, Mark Clendenning, Sally-Ann Pearson, Erika Pavluk, Belinda Nagler, John L Hopper, Michael R Gattas, Jack Goldblatt, Jill George, Graeme K Suthers, Kerry D Phillips, Sonja Woodall, Julie Arnold, Kathy Tucker, Michael Field, Sian Greening, Steve Gallinger, Melyssa Aronson, Renee Perrier, Michael O Woods, Jane S Green, Neal Walker, Christophe Rosty, Susan Parry, Joanne P Young

Abstract

Serrated polyposis (hyperplastic polyposis) is characterized by multiple polyps with serrated architecture in the colorectum. Although patients with serrated polyposis are known to be at increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and possibly extracolonic cancers, cancer risk for their relatives has not been widely explored. The aim of this study was to estimate the risks of CRC and extracolonic cancers for relatives of patients with serrated polyposis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Engineering 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,930,204
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Gastroenterology
#2,550
of 5,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,748
of 175,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Gastroenterology
#24
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.