You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How “simple” methodological decisions affect interpretation of population structure based on reduced representation library DNA sequencing: A case study using the lake whitefish
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0226608 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carly F. Graham, Douglas R. Boreham, Richard G. Manzon, Wendylee Stott, Joanna Y. Wilson, Christopher M. Somers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| Canada | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 17 | 74% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 26% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,770,757
of 25,318,210 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#34,180
of 219,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,840
of 467,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#470
of 2,561 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,318,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,561 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.