You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
European Collaborative and Interprofessional Capability Framework for Prevention and Management of Frailty—a consensus process supported by the Joint Action for Frailty Prevention (ADVANTAGE) and the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40520-019-01455-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Regina Roller-Wirnsberger, Sonja Lindner, Aaron Liew, Ronan O’Caoimh, Maria-Lamprini Koula, Dawn Moody, Juan Manuel Espinosa, Thérèse van Durme, Plamen Dimitrov, Tomislav Benjak, Elena Nicolaidou, Teija Hammar, Eliane Vanhecke, Ulrike Junius-Walker, Péter Csizmadia, Lucia Galluzzo, Jūratė Macijauskienė, Mohamed Salem, Liset Rietman, Anette Hylen Ranhoff, Tomasz Targowski, Miguel Telo de Arriaga, Elena Bozdog, Branko Gabrovec, Anne Hendry, Finbarr C. Martin, Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 50% |
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,611,205
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#1,001
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,904
of 473,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#29
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.