↓ Skip to main content

Antifungal Activities of Different Extracts of Marine Macroalgae Against Dermatophytes and Candida Species

Overview of attention for article published in Mycopathologia, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Antifungal Activities of Different Extracts of Marine Macroalgae Against Dermatophytes and Candida Species
Published in
Mycopathologia, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11046-012-9541-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elica Amara Cecilia Guedes, Maria Anilda dos Santos Araújo, Aryanna Kelly Pinheiro Souza, Larissa Isabela Oliveira de Souza, Lurdiana Dayse de Barros, Fernanda Cristina de Albuquerque Maranhão, Antônio Euzébio Goulart Sant’Ana

Abstract

Algae are bioactive natural resources, and due to the medical importance of superficial mycoses, we focused the action of macroalgae extracts against dermatophytes and Candida species. Seaweed obtained from the Riacho Doce beach, Alagoas (Brazil), were screened for the antifungal activity, through crude extracts using dichloromethane, chloroform, methanol, ethanol, water and chloroform and hexane fractions of green, brown and red algae in assays with standard strains of the dermatophytes Trichophyton rubrum, T. tonsurans, T. mentagrophytes, Microsporum canis, M. gypseum and yeasts Candida albicans, C. krusei, C. guilliermondi and C. parapsilosis. The M44-A and M27-A2/M38A manuals by CLSI were followed, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranged from 0.03 to 16.00 μg ml(-1), and an inhibition halo of 10.00-25.00 mm was observed for dermatophytes, while for yeast, it was from 8.00 to 16.00 μg ml(-1) and 10.00-15.00 mm. M. canis showed MIC of 0.03 μg ml(-1) and the largest inhibition halo in T. rubrum (25.00 mm) through the use of the methanol extract. For C. albicans, dichloromethane, methanol and ethanol extracts formed the largest inhibition halo. The ethanol extract was shown to be the best inhibiting fungi growth, and chloroform and hexane fractions of H. musciformis inhibited the growth of all dermatophytes and C. albicans, yielding the conclusion that apolar extracts obtained from algae presented the best activity against important pathogenic fungi.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Professor 9 11%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 19 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Environmental Science 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 21 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2014.
All research outputs
#13,129,385
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Mycopathologia
#589
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,422
of 162,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycopathologia
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.