You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Beneficial bile acid metabolism from Lactobacillus plantarum of food origin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-58069-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberta Prete, Sarah Louise Long, Alvaro Lopez Gallardo, Cormac G. Gahan, Aldo Corsetti, Susan A. Joyce |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 49 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 16 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 10% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,587,478
of 25,011,008 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#22,721
of 137,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,374
of 465,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#751
of 4,273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,011,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.