↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Regulation of the Gut Microbiota Engineered by a Minimal Defined Bacterial Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary Regulation of the Gut Microbiota Engineered by a Minimal Defined Bacterial Consortium
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2016
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0155620
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ting-Chin David Shen, Christel Chehoud, Josephine Ni, Evelyn Hsu, Ying-Yu Chen, Aubrey Bailey, Alice Laughlin, Kyle Bittinger, Frederic D Bushman, Gary D Wu

Abstract

We have recently reported that Altered Schaedler Flora (ASF) can be used to durably engineer the gut microbiota to reduce ammonia production as an effective modality to reduce morbidity and mortality in the setting of liver injury. Here we investigated the effects of a low protein diet on ASF colonization and its ability to engineer the microbiota. Initially, ASF inoculation was similar between mice fed a normal protein diet or low protein diet, but the outgrowth of gut microbiota differed over the ensuing month. Notable was the inability of the dominant Parabacteroides ASF taxon to exclude other taxa belonging to the Bacteroidetes phylum in the setting of a low protein diet. Instead, a poorly classified yet highly represented Bacteroidetes family, S24-7, returned within 4 weeks of inoculation in mice fed a low protein diet, demonstrating a reduction in ASF resilience in response to dietary stress. Nevertheless, fecal ammonia levels remained significantly lower than those observed in mice on the same low protein diet that received a transplant of normal feces. No deleterious effects were observed in host physiology due to ASF inoculation into mice on a low protein diet. In total, these results demonstrate that low protein diet can have a pronounced effect on engineering the gut microbiota but modulation of ammonia is preserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,831,048
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,706
of 215,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,603
of 318,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#530
of 4,854 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,854 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.