↓ Skip to main content

Insulin pump basal adjustment for exercise in type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover study

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Insulin pump basal adjustment for exercise in type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover study
Published in
Diabetologia, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00125-016-3981-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sybil A. McAuley, Jodie C. Horsburgh, Glenn M. Ward, André La Gerche, Judith L. Gooley, Alicia J. Jenkins, Richard J. MacIsaac, David N. O’Neal

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of exercise, vs rest, on circulating insulin and glucose, following pre-exercise insulin pump basal rate reduction. This was an open-label, two-stage randomised crossover study of 14 adults (seven women, seven men) with type 1 diabetes established on insulin pump therapy. In each stage, participants fasted and insulin delivery was halved following a single insulin basal rate overnight. Exercise (30 min moderate-intensity stationary bicycle exercise, starting 60 min post-basal reduction) and rest stages were undertaken in random order at a university hospital. Randomisation was computer-generated, and allocation concealed via sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes. Venous blood was collected at 15 min intervals from 60 min pre- until 210 min post-basal rate reduction. Changes in plasma free insulin (the primary outcome), and changes in plasma glucose, with exercise were compared with changes when resting. Outcomes were assessed blinded to group assignment. Following basal rate reduction when rested, mean (± SE) free insulin decreased by 4.9 ± 2.9%, 16.2 ± 2.6% and 18.6 ± 3.2% at 1, 2 and 3 h, respectively (p < 0.05 after 75 min). With exercise, relative to rest, mean free insulin increased by 6 ± 2 pmol/l after 15 min and 5 ± 2 pmol/l after 30 min (p < 0.001), then declined post-exercise (p < 0.001). Three participants (mean baseline glucose 5.0 ± 0.1 mmol/l) required glucose supplementation to prevent or treat exercise-related hypoglycaemia. In the other 11 participants (mean baseline glucose 8.4 ± 0.5 mmol/l), glucose increased by 0.8 ± 0.3 mmol/l with exercise (p = 0.028). Halving the basal insulin rate 1 h prior to exercise did not significantly reduce circulating free insulin by exercise commencement. Exercise itself transiently increased insulin levels. In participants with low-normal glucose pre-exercise, hypoglycaemia was not prevented by insulin basal rate reduction alone. Greater insulin basal rate reduction and supplemental carbohydrate may be required to prevent exercise-induced hypoglycaemia. ANZCTR.org.au ACTRN12613000581763 FUNDING: Australian Diabetes Society, Hugh DT Williamson Foundation, Lynne Quayle Charitable Trust Fund.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 9 7%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 15%
Sports and Recreations 17 13%
Engineering 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 33 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,451,193
of 25,081,505 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,919
of 5,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,574
of 316,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#37
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.