You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors associated with habitual time spent in different physical activity intensities using multiday accelerometry
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-57648-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lina Jaeschke, Astrid Steinbrecher, Heiner Boeing, Sylvia Gastell, Wolfgang Ahrens, Klaus Berger, Hermann Brenner, Nina Ebert, Beate Fischer, Karin Halina Greiser, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Rudolf Kaaks, Thomas Keil, Yvonne Kemmling, Alexander Kluttig, Lilian Krist, Michael Leitzmann, Wolfgang Lieb, Jakob Linseisen, Markus Löffler, Karin B. Michels, Nadia Obi, Annette Peters, Sabine Schipf, Börge Schmidt, Melanie Zinkhan, Tobias Pischon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 6 | 86% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,004,887
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#40,634
of 125,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,675
of 456,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,398
of 4,272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.