| Title |
A Matter of Taste: Local Explanations for the Consumption of Wild Food Plants in the Catalan Pyrenees and the Balearic Islands1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12231-016-9343-1 |
| Authors |
Ginesta Serrasolses, Laura Calvet-Mir, Esperança Carrió, Ugo D’Ambrosio, Teresa Garnatje, Montse Parada, Joan Vallès, Victoria Reyes-García |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Estonia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,160,066
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#799
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,881
of 323,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.