| Title |
Head Transplants, Personal Identity and Neuroethics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroethics, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12152-015-9245-4 |
| Authors |
Assya Pascalev, Mario Pascalev, James Giordano |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 35% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 9 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,943,114
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#95
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,460
of 391,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.