| Title |
A Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Assessment for Western Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pure and Applied Geophysics, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00024-008-0421-x |
| Authors |
David Burbidge, Phil R. Cummins, Richard Mleczko, Hong Kie Thio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 35 | 44% |
| Engineering | 24 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,499,159
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#97
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,278
of 187,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.