↓ Skip to main content

Comorbidity assessment and adjuvant radiochemotherapy in elderly affected by glioblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Oncology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Comorbidity assessment and adjuvant radiochemotherapy in elderly affected by glioblastoma
Published in
Medical Oncology, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12032-012-0246-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alba Fiorentino, Rocchina Caivano, Costanza Chiumento, Mariella Cozzolino, Stefania Clemente, Piernicola Pedicini, Vincenzo Fusco

Abstract

To assess the role of comorbidity on outcome in elderly patients with glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant Temozolomide, patients over 65 years with glioblastoma, who underwent surgical resection or biopsy and radiochemotherapy, were evaluated. The Adjusted-Age Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 were used to assess comorbidity. From April 2005 to January 2011, 35 patients (median age 72 years) were treated in our Institution. Thirteen patients had a Charlson score more than 3, while, according to the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27, 21 patients had mild or severe comorbid conditions. Patients with low Charlson comorbidity score experienced a longer survival time than those with higher score (22 vs. 10 months, respectively). The Adjusted-Age Charlson Comorbidity Index influenced survival at univariate and multivariate analysis (p = 0.004, p = 0.001, respectively). No comorbidity index was a predictor for progression-free survival. Our data suggested that the association of radiotherapy with TMZ was safe and effective. Perhaps, the comorbidity assessment could be an appropriate tool in the treatment decision for elderly patients with glioblastoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 54%
Psychology 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2012.
All research outputs
#15,243,549
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Medical Oncology
#631
of 1,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,382
of 163,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Oncology
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,280 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.