↓ Skip to main content

Enhanced interpretation of nonverbal facial cues in male rapists—a preliminary study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Enhanced interpretation of nonverbal facial cues in male rapists—a preliminary study
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf01542222
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. James Giannini, Kay Whitney Fellows

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 29%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 71%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2016.
All research outputs
#8,514,813
of 25,385,864 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,353
of 3,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,025
of 10,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.