↓ Skip to main content

Studies on fish scale formation and resorption

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, October 1979
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Studies on fish scale formation and resorption
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, October 1979
DOI 10.1007/bf00236999
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi Onozato, Norimitsu Watabe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#527
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,564
of 6,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them