| Title |
Using marine macroalgae for carbon sequestration: a critical appraisal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-010-9604-9 |
| Authors |
Ik Kyo Chung, John Beardall, Smita Mehta, Dinabandhu Sahoo, Slobodanka Stojkovic |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 667 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 651 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 114 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 108 | 16% |
| Researcher | 88 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 13% |
| Other | 36 | 5% |
| Other | 96 | 14% |
| Unknown | 137 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 199 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 159 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 38 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 4% |
| Engineering | 23 | 3% |
| Other | 52 | 8% |
| Unknown | 169 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,078,395
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#30
of 2,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,283
of 113,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,672 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.