↓ Skip to main content

The future of molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
230 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
619 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
The future of molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery
Published in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10822-011-9517-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

David W. Borhani, David E. Shaw

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations can now track rapid processes--those occurring in less than about a millisecond--at atomic resolution for many biologically relevant systems. These simulations appear poised to exert a significant impact on how new drugs are found, perhaps even transforming the very process of drug discovery. We predict here future results we can expect from, and enhancements we need to make in, molecular dynamics simulations over the coming 25 years, and in so doing set out several Grand Challenges for the field. In the context of the problems now facing the pharmaceutical industry, we ask how we can best address drug discovery needs of the next quarter century using molecular dynamics simulations, and we suggest some possible approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 619 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 3%
United Kingdom 9 1%
Spain 6 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 563 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 155 25%
Researcher 115 19%
Student > Master 63 10%
Student > Bachelor 50 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 6%
Other 105 17%
Unknown 93 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 150 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 111 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 76 12%
Physics and Astronomy 32 5%
Engineering 30 5%
Other 98 16%
Unknown 122 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,825,702
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#77
of 965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,704
of 255,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.