↓ Skip to main content

Some Implications of a Sample of Practical Turing Tests

Overview of attention for article published in Minds and Machines, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Some Implications of a Sample of Practical Turing Tests
Published in
Minds and Machines, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11023-013-9301-y
Authors

Kevin Warwick, Huma Shah, James Moor

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 31%
Philosophy 3 12%
Engineering 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Minds and Machines
#146
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,713
of 288,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minds and Machines
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.