↓ Skip to main content

The Mechanisms of Mindfulness in the Treatment of Mental Illness and Addiction

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
The Mechanisms of Mindfulness in the Treatment of Mental Illness and Addiction
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11469-016-9653-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edo Shonin, William Van Gordon

Abstract

Consistent with its growing popularity amongst the general public and medical community, throughout recent decades there have been increasing attempts to understand the mechanisms that underlie therapeutic improvement in individuals receiving mindfulness training. The current paper draws upon findings from various remits of scientific enquiry and summarises key evidence-based mechanisms of mindfulness that have been proposed in the academic literature to date. Empirical findings indicate that mindfulness targets biological, psychological, social, and spiritual psychopathology determinants. Furthermore, the mechanistic pathways exploited by mindfulness are likely to vary according to factors such as (i) the type of mindfulness-based intervention that is administered (e.g., first- or second-generation mindfulness-based interventions), (ii) the specific clinical disorder that is being targeted, (iii) the educational, social, and spiritual history of the participant, and (iv) the extent to which the mindfulness instructor truly embodies the principles of mindful living. It is hoped that the mechanisms of mindfulness discussed in this paper will contribute to the formulation of a more complete picture that can be tested and expanded upon during future scientific enquiry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 187 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 13 7%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 54 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 74 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 59 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#14,223,569
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#495
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,885
of 316,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.