↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic evaluation of rapid tests for scrub typhus in the Indian population is needed

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases of Poverty, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic evaluation of rapid tests for scrub typhus in the Indian population is needed
Published in
Infectious Diseases of Poverty, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40249-016-0137-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siddharudha Shivalli

Abstract

Owing to frequent outbreaks witnessed in different parts of the country in the recent past, scrub typhus is being described as a re-emerging infectious disease in India. Differentiating scrub typhus from other endemic diseases like malaria, leptospirosis, dengue fever, typhoid, etc. is difficult due to overlapping clinical features and a lower positivity for eschars in Asian populations. Hence, the diagnosis heavily relies on laboratory tests. Costs and the need of technical expertise limit the wide use of indirect immunoperoxidase or immunofluorescence assays, ELISA and PCR. The Weil-Felix test is the most commonly used and least expensive serological test, but lacks both sensitivity and specificity. Hence, the diagnosis of scrub typhus is often delayed or overlooked. With due consideration of the cost, rapidity, single test result and simplicity of interpretation, rapid diagnostic tests have come into vogue. However, evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests for scrub typhus in the Indian population is needed to justify or discourage their use. Research studies are needed to find the most suitable test in terms of the rapidity of the result, simplicity of the procedure, ease of interpretation and cost to be used in the Indian populace.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 18 23%