↓ Skip to main content

A low response rate does not necessarily indicate non-response bias in gastroenterology survey research: a population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
A low response rate does not necessarily indicate non-response bias in gastroenterology survey research: a population-based study
Published in
The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10389-012-0513-z
Authors

Rok Seon Choung, G. Richard Locke, Cathy D. Schleck, Jeanette Y. Ziegenfuss, Timothy J. Beebe, Alan R. Zinsmeister, Nicholas J. Talley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 35%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 11%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2016.
All research outputs
#8,544,290
of 25,394,081 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,281
of 175,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,081 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them