| Title |
Is there a gender difference in scientific collaboration? A scientometric examination of co-authorships among industrial–organizational psychologists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-016-1967-5 |
| Authors |
Clemens B. Fell, Cornelius J. König |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 33% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Librarian | 8 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 29% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,519,340
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,009
of 2,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,475
of 324,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#17
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.