| Title |
Accuracy of computer algorithms and the human eye in scoring actigraphy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sleep and Breathing, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11325-012-0709-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathleen Boyne, David D. Sherry, Paul R. Gallagher, Margaret Olsen, Lee J. Brooks |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal scoring method and parameter settings of actigraphy by comparison to simultaneous polysomnography (PSG). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 25% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 21% |
| Psychology | 17 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,306,425
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Breathing
#838
of 1,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,984
of 163,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Breathing
#14
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,373 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.