↓ Skip to main content

Reliable Suction Detection for Patients With Rotary Blood Pumps

Overview of attention for article published in ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliable Suction Detection for Patients With Rotary Blood Pumps
Published in
ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, July 2008
DOI 10.1097/mat.0b013e31817b5b0e
Pubmed ID
Authors

David G. Mason, Andrew K. Hilton, Robert F. Salamonsen

Abstract

All rotary blood pumps (RBPs) are prone to the harmful effects of ventricular collapse or "suction events" because of over-pumping, because they are inherently preload insensitive devices, yet RBP controllers do not comprise a clinically reliable suction detector. We therefore investigated the clinical performance of seven expertly selected time domain indices of suction based on the observed positive spike induced in the RBP impeller speed waveform. Using expert panel classifications, a balanced set of 404 five-second speed snapshots of normal and suction events was created from the impeller speed 25 Hz data in 12 VentrAssist implant patients. Initially, suction index threshold levels were set differently for each patient, giving best sensitivity 95% and specificity 99%. However, analysis of paired combinations of suction indices with fixed thresholds identified one pair giving an acceptable sensitivity of 99.5% and specificity 97.5%; the low number of high speed data samples relative to the speed snapshot mean and maximum OR the largest increase in successive speed maxima. The additional precondition of RBP speed amplitude exceeding a low threshold level allows its more general application to patients with low cardiac contractility. This gives a suction detector with high clinical utility; requiring three index threshold settings only.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,959,162
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs
#990
of 2,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,777
of 95,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.