↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of equal doses of continuous venovenous haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration on ciprofloxacin population pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of equal doses of continuous venovenous haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration on ciprofloxacin population pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients
Published in
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), March 2016
DOI 10.1093/jac/dkw043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire Roger, Steven C. Wallis, Benjamin Louart, Jean-Yves Lefrant, Jeffrey Lipman, Laurent Muller, Jason A. Roberts

Abstract

Whilst commonly performed in ICUs, renal replacement therapies (RRTs) differ in their solute clearances. There is a paucity of data on ciprofloxacin clearances in different RRT techniques. The aim of this study was to compare the population pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin during equal doses of continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVHF) and continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in septic patients. Patients receiving 400 mg of ciprofloxacin intravenously 8 or 12 hourly and undergoing either CVVHF or CVVHDF were eligible. Up to 10 blood samples were collected over one dosing interval and analysed by a validated chromatographic method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulation was undertaken using Pmetrics. Eighteen sampling intervals were included (8 CVVHDF and 10 CVVHF) from 11 patients (6 patients having sampling during both RRT modes). A two-compartment linear model best described the data. Increasing patient weight was the only covariate associated with increasing drug clearance. The mean (SD) parameter estimates were: clearance, 10.7 (5.3) L/h; volume of distribution of the central compartment, 21.3 (11.3) L; rate constant for drug distribution from the central compartment to the peripheral compartment, 10.9 (4.3) L/h; and rate constant for drug distribution from the peripheral compartment to the central compartment, 2.3 (1.8) L/h. After accounting for patient weight, the mean ciprofloxacin clearance was not statistically different between CVVHF and CVVHDF [11.8 (9.9) and 10.3 (7.4) L/h, respectively, P = 0.43]. The present study indicates a high pharmacokinetic variability of ciprofloxacin during CVVHF and CVVHDF with no significant differences in clearance apparent. Based on patient weight, higher ciprofloxacin dosing regimens should be used in critically ill patients when difficult-to-treat pathogens are suspected.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Other 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,602,949
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#5,406
of 8,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,082
of 313,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#65
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.