| Title |
Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2165/00019053-200624010-00001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. E. Ades, Mark Sculpher, Alex Sutton, Keith Abrams, Nicola Cooper, Nicky Welton, Guobing Lu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Professor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 31% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 19 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#322
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,892
of 189,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#50
of 548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.