↓ Skip to main content

The Coping Cat Program for Children with Anxiety and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
356 Mendeley
Title
The Coping Cat Program for Children with Anxiety and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1541-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca H. McNally Keehn, Alan J. Lincoln, Milton Z. Brown, Denise A. Chavira

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate whether a modified version of the Coping Cat program could be effective in reducing anxiety in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Twenty-two children (ages 8-14; IQ ≥ 70) with ASD and clinically significant anxiety were randomly assigned to 16 sessions of the Coping Cat program (cognitive-behavioral therapy; CBT) or a 16-week waitlist. Children in the CBT condition evidenced significantly larger reductions in anxiety than those in the waitlist. Treatment gains were largely maintained at two-month follow-up. Results provide preliminary evidence that a modified version of the Coping Cat program may be a feasible and effective program for reducing clinically significant levels of anxiety in children with high-functioning ASD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 350 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 13%
Student > Bachelor 42 12%
Researcher 34 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 9%
Other 60 17%
Unknown 69 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 183 51%
Social Sciences 23 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 84 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,468,053
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,057
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,939
of 177,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#10
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.