You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is concordance with World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines for cancer prevention related to subsequent risk of cancer? Results from the EPIC study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.111.031674 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dora Romaguera, Anne-Claire Vergnaud, Petra H Peeters, Carla H van Gils, Doris S M Chan, Pietro Ferrari, Isabelle Romieu, Mazda Jenab, Nadia Slimani, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Guy Fagherazzi, Florence Perquier, Rudolf Kaaks, Birgit Teucher, Heiner Boeing, Anne von Rüsten, Anne Tjønneland, Anja Olsen, Christina C Dahm, Kim Overvad, José Ramón Quirós, Carlos A Gonzalez, María José Sánchez, Carmen Navarro, Aurelio Barricarte, Miren Dorronsoro, Kay-Tee Khaw, Nicholas J Wareham, Francesca L Crowe, Timothy J Key, Antonia Trichopoulou, Pagona Lagiou, Christina Bamia, Giovanna Masala, Paolo Vineis, Rosario Tumino, Sabina Sieri, Salvatore Panico, Anne M May, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Frederike L Büchner, Elisabet Wirfält, Jonas Manjer, Ingegerd Johansson, Göran Hallmans, Guri Skeie, Kristin Benjaminsen Borch, Christine L Parr, Elio Riboli, Teresa Norat |
| Abstract |
In 2007 the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and the American Institute of Cancer Research (AICR) issued 8 recommendations (plus 2 special recommendations) on diet, physical activity, and weight management for cancer prevention on the basis of the most comprehensive collection of available evidence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Australia | 2 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 264 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 20% |
| Unknown | 59 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 68 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,342,825
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#3,696
of 12,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,115
of 180,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#32
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.