You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Multi-region assessment of pharmaceutical exposures and predicted effects in USA wadeable urban-gradient streams
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0228214 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul M. Bradley, Celeste A. Journey, Daniel T. Button, Daren M. Carlisle, Bradley J. Huffman, Sharon L. Qi, Kristin M. Romanok, Peter C. Van Metre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 50% |
Papua New Guinea | 1 | 10% |
Canada | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 26 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 13 | 17% |
Engineering | 9 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 31 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,374,678
of 23,191,112 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#17,866
of 198,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,449
of 451,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#264
of 2,575 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,191,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,575 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.