↓ Skip to main content

Codon 200 mutation of the prion gene: genotype–phenotype correlations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Codon 200 mutation of the prion gene: genotype–phenotype correlations
Published in
Journal of Neurology, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00415-012-6539-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter K. Panegyres, Judy G. S. Goh, Jack Goldblatt

Abstract

Genetic mutations as a cause of prion diseases are rare. We describe a large family with multiple affected members with the codon E200K prion mutation. To improve understanding of the genotype-phenotype correlations of prion gene mutations, clinical, genetic and neuropathological data were obtained from family members over 15 years. Six patients with the codon E200K mutation and 2 patients without the codon 200 mutation from this family were followed. The 6 patients with the codon 200 mutation had a mean age onset of 58.83 years (SD 7.2; lower 95 % CI 51.0; upper 95 % CI 66.4). The most common symptoms at onset were memory loss, walking difficulties and hallucinations. The most frequent neurological phenomena were a rapidly progressive dementia, eye movement abnormalities and ataxia. The mean duration of onset of symptoms to death was 3.9 months (SD 1.1; lower 95 % CI 2.8; upper 95 % CI 5.1). Two male patients developed neurodegenerative disorders unrelated to the prion codon 200 mutation: progressive supranuclear palsy and olivopontocerebellar degeneration. Their mean survival was 96 months (SD 33.9; p < 0.0001). Individuals from families with the prion codon 200 mutation may have a rapidly progressive dementia. Members of families with inherited prion mutations may be at risk of other neurodegenerative disorders unrelated to the prion mutation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Psychology 5 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,306,425
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,618
of 4,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,142
of 163,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#32
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.