↓ Skip to main content

Injury patterns and risk factors for orthopaedic trauma from snowboarding and skiing: a national perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Injury patterns and risk factors for orthopaedic trauma from snowboarding and skiing: a national perspective
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00167-016-4137-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bryce A. Basques, Elizabeth C. Gardner, Andre M. Samuel, Matthew L. Webb, Adam M. Lukasiewicz, Daniel D. Bohl, Jonathan N. Grauer

Abstract

Alpine skiing and snowboarding are both popular winter sports that can be associated with significant orthopaedic injuries. However, there is a lack of nationally representative injury data for the two sports. The National Trauma Data Bank was queried for patients presenting to emergency departments due to injuries sustained from skiing and snowboarding during 2011 and 2012. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and injury patterns were tabulated and compared between skiing and snowboarding. Risk factors for increased injury severity score and lack of helmet use were identified using multivariate logistic regression. Of the 6055 patients identified, 55.2 % were skiers. Sixty-one percent had fractures. Lower extremity fractures were the most common injury and occurred more often in skiers (p < 0.001). Upper extremity fractures were more common in snowboarders, particularly distal radius fractures (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, increased injury severity was independently associated with age 18-29, 60-69, 70+, male sex, a positive blood test for alcohol, a positive blood test for an illegal substance, and wearing a helmet. Lack of helmet use was associated with age 18-29, 30-39, smoking, a positive drug test for an illegal substance, and snowboarding. Young adults, the elderly, and those using substances were shown to be at greater risk of increased injury severity and lack of helmet use. The results of this study can be used clinically to guide the initial assessment of these individuals following injury, as well as for targeting preventive measures and education. Prognostic Level III.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 27 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Sports and Recreations 6 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 32 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,729,598
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#849
of 2,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,721
of 312,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#19
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.