↓ Skip to main content

How High is Hispanic/Mexican Fertility in the United States? Immigration and Tempo Considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
How High is Hispanic/Mexican Fertility in the United States? Immigration and Tempo Considerations
Published in
Demography, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13524-011-0045-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilio A. Parrado

Abstract

In this article, I demonstrate that the apparently much higher fertility of Hispanic/Mexican women in the United States is almost exclusively the product of period estimates obtained for immigrant women and that period measures of immigrant fertility suffer from three serious sources of bias that together significantly overstate fertility levels: difficulties in estimating the size of immigrant groups; the tendency for migration to occur at a particular stage in life; and, most importantly, the tendency for women to have a birth soon after migration. When these sources of bias are taken into consideration, the fertility of native Hispanic/Mexican women is very close to replacement level. In addition, the completed fertility of immigrant women in the United States is dramatically lower than the level obtained from period calculations. Findings are consistent with classical theories of immigrant assimilation but are a striking departure from the patterns found in previous studies and published statistics. The main implication is that without a significant change in immigration levels, current projections based on the premise of high Hispanic fertility are likely to considerably exaggerate Hispanic population growth, its impact on the ethno-racial profile of the country, and its potential to counteract population aging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Spain 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 102 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 40%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 71 65%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,485,080
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#883
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,623
of 114,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.