| Title |
Increased fluid intake to prevent urinary tract infections: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x708125 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Mae Scott, Justin Clark, Chris Del Mar, Paul Glasziou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 28 | 42% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 10% |
| Scientists | 5 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#586,463
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#241
of 4,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,748
of 477,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.