↓ Skip to main content

Replacement Migration: A Questionable Tactic for Delaying the Inevitable Effects of Fertility Transition

Overview of attention for article published in Population and Environment, March 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Replacement Migration: A Questionable Tactic for Delaying the Inevitable Effects of Fertility Transition
Published in
Population and Environment, March 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1006749722702
Authors

Frederick A. B. Meyerson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Student > Master 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 50%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 13%
Computer Science 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Population and Environment
#193
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,267
of 42,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population and Environment
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.