You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A difficult conversation? The views and experiences of parents and professionals on the consent process for perinatal postmortem after stillbirth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03357.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
AEP Heazell, M‐J McLaughlin, EB Schmidt, P Cox, V Flenady, TY Khong, S Downe |
| Abstract |
To describe the experiences, knowledge and views of both parents and professionals regarding the consent process for perinatal postmortem. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 196 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 20% |
| Unknown | 45 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 19% |
| Psychology | 27 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 51 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,297,159
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#906
of 6,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,835
of 176,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#12
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.