↓ Skip to main content

Potent Zika and dengue cross-neutralizing antibodies induced by Zika vaccination in a dengue-experienced donor

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
43 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potent Zika and dengue cross-neutralizing antibodies induced by Zika vaccination in a dengue-experienced donor
Published in
Nature Medicine, February 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41591-019-0746-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent Dussupt, Rajeshwer S. Sankhala, Gregory D. Gromowski, Gina Donofrio, Rafael A. De La Barrera, Rafael A. Larocca, Weam Zaky, Letzibeth Mendez-Rivera, Misook Choe, Edgar Davidson, Michael K. McCracken, James D. Brien, Peter Abbink, Hongjun Bai, Aubrey L. Bryan, Candace Hope Bias, Irina Maljkovic Berry, Nubia Botero, Tanya Cook, Nicole A. Doria-Rose, Ariadna Grinyo i Escuer, Justice Akuoku Frimpong, Aviva Geretz, Mayda Hernandez, Bradley S. Hollidge, Ningbo Jian, Kareem Kabra, David J. Leggat, Jinyan Liu, Amelia K. Pinto, Wiriya Rutvisuttinunt, Ian Setliff, Ursula Tran, Samantha Townsley, Benjamin J. Doranz, Morgane Rolland, Adrian B. McDermott, Ivelin S. Georgiev, Rasmi Thomas, Merlin L. Robb, Kenneth H. Eckels, Elizabeth Barranco, Michael Koren, Darci R. Smith, Richard G. Jarman, Sarah L. George, Kathryn E. Stephenson, Dan H. Barouch, Kayvon Modjarrad, Nelson L. Michael, M. Gordon Joyce, Shelly J. Krebs

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 38 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 23 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 47 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2021.
All research outputs
#759,389
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#2,115
of 9,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,192
of 473,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#60
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.