↓ Skip to main content

Are long-term bisphosphonate users a reality? Dose years for current bisphosphonate users assessed using the danish national prescription database

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Are long-term bisphosphonate users a reality? Dose years for current bisphosphonate users assessed using the danish national prescription database
Published in
Osteoporosis International, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00198-012-1994-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Abrahamsen

Abstract

The prevalence of long-term bisphosphonate use may be low due to low refill compliance and gaps in treatment. An analysis of the prescription history of 58,674 bisphosphonate users in Denmark found that only 2.8 % had received ten dose years of treatment or above.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 40%
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2012.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,450
of 3,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,962
of 165,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#16
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.