You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic basis for RNA alterations in cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-1970-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudia Calabrese, Natalie R. Davidson, Deniz Demircioğlu, Nuno A. Fonseca, Yao He, André Kahles, Kjong-Van Lehmann, Fenglin Liu, Yuichi Shiraishi, Cameron M. Soulette, Lara Urban, Liliana Greger, Siliang Li, Dongbing Liu, Marc D. Perry, Qian Xiang, Fan Zhang, Junjun Zhang, Peter Bailey, Serap Erkek, Katherine A. Hoadley, Yong Hou, Matthew R. Huska, Helena Kilpinen, Jan O. Korbel, Maximillian G. Marin, Julia Markowski, Tannistha Nandi, Qiang Pan-Hammarström, Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu, Reiner Siebert, Stefan G. Stark, Hong Su, Patrick Tan, Sebastian M. Waszak, Christina Yung, Shida Zhu, Philip Awadalla, Chad J. Creighton, Matthew Meyerson, B. F. Francis Ouellette, Kui Wu, Huanming Yang, Alvis Brazma, Angela N. Brooks, Jonathan Göke, Gunnar Rätsch, Roland F. Schwarz, Oliver Stegle, Zemin Zhang |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 152 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 41 | 27% |
| Japan | 12 | 8% |
| Germany | 11 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 7% |
| Singapore | 5 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 84 | 55% |
| Scientists | 63 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 960 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 960 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 196 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 160 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 67 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 6% |
| Other | 133 | 14% |
| Unknown | 281 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 299 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 121 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 37 | 4% |
| Engineering | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 78 | 8% |
| Unknown | 310 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2026.
All research outputs
#275,811
of 34,570,332 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#14,372
of 117,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,836
of 515,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#258
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,570,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 96.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.