↓ Skip to main content

Genetic reassortment between Sathuperi and Shamonda viruses of the genus Orthobunyavirus in nature: implications for their genetic relationship to Schmallenberg virus

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Genetic reassortment between Sathuperi and Shamonda viruses of the genus Orthobunyavirus in nature: implications for their genetic relationship to Schmallenberg virus
Published in
Archives of Virology, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00705-012-1341-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tohru Yanase, Tomoko Kato, Maki Aizawa, Yozo Shuto, Hiroaki Shirafuji, Makoto Yamakawa, Tomoyuki Tsuda

Abstract

The recent outbreak of malformations in ruminants in Northern Europe caused by Schmallenberg virus induced us to analyze the genetic properties of the related orthobunyaviruses and clarify their relationship. The sequencing of three genomic RNA segments of Sathuperi, Shamonda and Douglas viruses (SATV, SHAV and DOUV) revealed that the M RNA segment of SATV and DOUV had a high degree of sequence identity with that of Schmallenberg virus, but the S and L RNA segments closely matched those of SHAV. Phylogenetic analysis of the three genomic RNA segments indicated that Schmallenberg virus is a reassortant, with the M RNA segment from SATV and the S and L RNA segments from SHAV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 28%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 18 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,719,828
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#67
of 4,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,690
of 179,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,584 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.