You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identifying mechanisms of genetic differentiation among populations in vagile species: historical factors dominate genetic differentiation in seabirds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Reviews, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/brv.12580 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anicee J. Lombal, James E. O'dwyer, Vicki Friesen, Eric J. Woehler, Christopher P. Burridge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Portugal | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Denmark | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,197,614
of 24,488,567 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#512
of 1,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,614
of 459,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,488,567 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.