You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Photoswitching mechanism of a fluorescent protein revealed by time-resolved crystallography and transient absorption spectroscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-14537-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joyce Woodhouse, Gabriela Nass Kovacs, Nicolas Coquelle, Lucas M. Uriarte, Virgile Adam, Thomas R. M. Barends, Martin Byrdin, Eugenio de la Mora, R. Bruce Doak, Mikolaj Feliks, Martin Field, Franck Fieschi, Virginia Guillon, Stefan Jakobs, Yasumasa Joti, Pauline Macheboeuf, Koji Motomura, Karol Nass, Shigeki Owada, Christopher M. Roome, Cyril Ruckebusch, Giorgio Schirò, Robert L. Shoeman, Michel Thepaut, Tadashi Togashi, Kensuke Tono, Makina Yabashi, Marco Cammarata, Lutz Foucar, Dominique Bourgeois, Michel Sliwa, Jacques-Philippe Colletier, Ilme Schlichting, Martin Weik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 27% |
| Chemistry | 23 | 20% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,123,267
of 25,235,400 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#26,706
of 55,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,687
of 463,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#785
of 1,429 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,235,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,429 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.