| Title |
A placebo-controlled study to assess Standardized Field Sobriety Tests performance during alcohol and cannabis intoxication in heavy cannabis users and accuracy of point of collection testing devices for detecting THC in oral fluid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-012-2732-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W. M. Bosker, E. L. Theunissen, S. Conen, K. P. C. Kuypers, W. K. Jeffery, H. C. Walls, G. F. Kauert, S. W. Toennes, M. R. Moeller, J. G. Ramaekers |
| Abstract |
Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST) and oral fluid devices are used to screen for driving impairment and roadside drug detection, respectively. SFST have been validated for alcohol, but their sensitivity to impairment induced by other drugs is relatively unknown. The sensitivity and specificity for Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) of most oral fluid devices have been low. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 57% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 9% |
| Psychology | 10 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 36 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#245,667
of 23,544,006 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#72
of 5,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,116
of 164,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,006 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.