↓ Skip to main content

Is There Altered Activity of the Extensor Muscles in Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain? A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is There Altered Activity of the Extensor Muscles in Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain? A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, May 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaun O'Leary, Barbara Cagnie, Ashton Reeve, Gwendolen Jull, James M. Elliott

Abstract

To compare the pattern of neck extensor muscle use in participants with chronic mechanical neck pain to that of healthy controls during 2 different extension exercises by use of muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging (mfMRI).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 144 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 17 11%
Other 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 40 26%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 15%
Sports and Recreations 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 37 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2012.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#4,490
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,057
of 121,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.