↓ Skip to main content

Motor and Tactile-Perceptual Skill Differences Between Individuals with High-Functioning Autism and Typically Developing Individuals Ages 5–21

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Motor and Tactile-Perceptual Skill Differences Between Individuals with High-Functioning Autism and Typically Developing Individuals Ages 5–21
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-011-1439-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sana M. N. Abu-Dahab, Elizabeth R. Skidmore, Margo B. Holm, Joan C. Rogers, Nancy J. Minshew

Abstract

We examined motor and tactile-perceptual skills in individuals with high-functioning autism (IHFA) and matched typically developing individuals (TDI) ages 5-21 years. Grip strength, motor speed and coordination were impaired in IHFA compared to matched TDI, and the differences between groups varied with age. Although tactile-perceptual skills of IHFA were impaired compared to TDI on several measures, impairments were significant only for stereognosis. Motor and tactile-perceptual skills should be assessed in children with IHFA and intervention should begin early because these skills are essential to school performance. Impairments in coordination and stereognosis suggest a broad though selective under-development of the circuitry for higher order abilities regardless of domain that is important in the search for the underlying disturbances in neurological development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 168 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 16%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 36 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 41 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2013.
All research outputs
#15,095,138
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,544
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,478
of 255,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#27
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.