↓ Skip to main content

ECMO criteria for influenza A (H1N1)-associated ARDS: role of transpulmonary pressure

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
185 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
ECMO criteria for influenza A (H1N1)-associated ARDS: role of transpulmonary pressure
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00134-012-2490-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salvatore Grasso, Pierpaolo Terragni, Alberto Birocco, Rosario Urbino, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Claudia Filippini, Luciana Mascia, Antonio Pesenti, Alberto Zangrillo, Luciano Gattinoni, V. Marco Ranieri

Abstract

To assess whether partitioning the elastance of the respiratory system (E (RS)) between lung (E (L)) and chest wall (E (CW)) elastance in order to target values of end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (PPLAT(L)) close to its upper physiological limit (25 cmH(2)O) may optimize oxygenation allowing conventional treatment in patients with influenza A (H1N1)-associated ARDS referred for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 210 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 18%
Other 31 14%
Student > Postgraduate 24 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 57 27%
Unknown 30 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 68%
Engineering 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 36 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,848,056
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,470
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,352
of 248,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.