| Title |
Patient Use of Secure Electronic Messaging Within a Shared Medical Record: A Cross-sectional Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-008-0899-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James D. Ralston, Carolyn M. Rutter, David Carrell, Julia Hecht, David Rubanowice, Gregory E. Simon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 22 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 39% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,347,507
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,092
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,321
of 175,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.