↓ Skip to main content

ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of…

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
4436 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3519 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC
Published in
European Heart Journal, May 2012
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs104
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. J. V. McMurray, S. Adamopoulos, S. D. Anker, A. Auricchio, M. Bohm, K. Dickstein, V. Falk, G. Filippatos, C. Fonseca, M. A. Gomez-Sanchez, T. Jaarsma, L. Kober, G. Y. H. Lip, A. P. Maggioni, A. Parkhomenko, B. M. Pieske, B. A. Popescu, P. K. Ronnevik, F. H. Rutten, J. Schwitter, P. Seferovic, J. Stepinska, P. T. Trindade, A. A. Voors, F. Zannad, A. Zeiher, J. J. Bax, H. Baumgartner, C. Ceconi, V. Dean, C. Deaton, R. Fagard, C. Funck-Brentano, D. Hasdai, A. Hoes, P. Kirchhof, J. Knuuti, P. Kolh, T. McDonagh, C. Moulin, B. A. Popescu, Z. Reiner, U. Sechtem, P. A. Sirnes, M. Tendera, A. Torbicki, A. Vahanian, S. Windecker, T. McDonagh, U. Sechtem, L. A. Bonet, P. Avraamides, H. A. Ben Lamin, M. Brignole, A. Coca, P. Cowburn, H. Dargie, P. Elliott, F. A. Flachskampf, G. F. Guida, S. Hardman, B. Iung, B. Merkely, C. Mueller, J. N. Nanas, O. W. Nielsen, S. Orn, J. T. Parissis, P. Ponikowski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,519 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 17 <1%
Italy 14 <1%
United States 14 <1%
United Kingdom 10 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
Brazil 8 <1%
Netherlands 7 <1%
Uruguay 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Other 54 2%
Unknown 3379 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 479 14%
Student > Master 438 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 402 11%
Other 356 10%
Student > Bachelor 349 10%
Other 882 25%
Unknown 613 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2026 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 151 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 141 4%
Engineering 86 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 2%
Other 300 9%
Unknown 733 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#381,336
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#649
of 11,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,704
of 180,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#2
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.