↓ Skip to main content

Peer Reporting and the Perception of Fairness

Overview of attention for article published in De Economist, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Peer Reporting and the Perception of Fairness
Published in
De Economist, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10645-012-9192-y
Authors

Salima Douhou, Jan R. Magnus, Arthur van Soest

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 17%
Psychology 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2016.
All research outputs
#21,358,731
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from De Economist
#265
of 270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,112
of 164,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from De Economist
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.