↓ Skip to main content

Renegotiation and Relative Performance Evaluation: Why an Informative Signal May Be Useless

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Accounting Studies, March 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Renegotiation and Relative Performance Evaluation: Why an Informative Signal May Be Useless
Published in
Review of Accounting Studies, March 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1011386104784
Authors

Andrew Tzelung Yim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 10 28%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 17 47%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 8%
Engineering 3 8%
Chemistry 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,326,948
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Review of Accounting Studies
#171
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,566
of 40,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Accounting Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them